Dear Wolfgang Denk, On 02.09.12 22:33, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Andreas Bießmann, > > In message <[email protected]> you wrote: >> >>> NOTE: it's not uboot specific, PW is now used by linux kernel too, so let= >> 's stop >>> this trouble ASAP. >> >> AFAIR there is a problem using 'pwclient git-am' with some mbox of mine >> (really need to fix pwclient ...), but all my patches went to patchwork >> without problems. > > Lucky you. I think therer are two problems. One is that PW > sometimes silently drops such patches. The other is that pwclient > cannot find the patch based on the computed hash. I didn't check if > one or both bugs hit here. In any case, applying the patches > through pwclient failed eith a "patch not found" error.
No, it is a bug related to utf-8 and wrong conversion of content in patchwork: ---8<--- andreas@andreas-mbp % pwclient list -w "Andreas Bießmann" -s New Patches submitted by Andreas Bießmann <[email protected]>: ID State Name -- ----- ---- 137529 New [U-Boot,v4] tools/env: add posibility to inject configuration 176885 New [U-Boot] dlmalloc: remove manual reloc alias warning 177964 New [U-Boot] net:macb: add line break 177976 New [U-Boot] avr32:portmux: fix setup for macb1 177978 New [U-Boot] avr32: add atngw100mkii board 180195 New [U-Boot,RFC] atmel:dataflash: remove unused mmc_mux 180943 New [U-Boot] devkit8000: add rootwait to mmcboot option andreas@andreas-mbp % pwclient git-am 177964 Applying patch #177964 using 'git am' Description: [U-Boot] net:macb: add line break Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/andreas/bin/pwclient", line 481, in <module> main() File "/Users/andreas/bin/pwclient", line 464, in main action_apply(rpc, patch_id, ['git', 'am']) File "/Users/andreas/bin/pwclient", line 272, in action_apply proc.communicate(s) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 729, in communicate self.stdin.write(input) UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xdf' in position 585: ordinal not in range(128) --->8--- There may be some additional issues with 'patch not found' when working with the hash. I did not discover these cause I do not work with hash but use the id. Best regards, Andreas Bießmann _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
