On Sunday 02 June 2013 03:34:27 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 01 June 2013 02:31:27 Jeremy Kerr wrote: > > > would it be possible to have http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/ track glibc ? > > > > Yep, no problem at all. I can merge the two lists into the one project, > > but I figure you'd need to distinguish the patches somehow, right? > > lemme see how the rest of the group wants to handle things. i think they > should be merged, but i think there should be only one list too, and i > didn't win in that decision :).
erp, forgot about this. people agree there should be one project that'd merge the lists. > > > subscribing to those lists can be done here: > > > http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/development.html > > > > If you're able to manually subscribe an address to those lists (i.e., > > bypassing the confirmation step through the list admin interface), then > > that makes things a little easier for me. If not, then it's not a huge > > problem. > > i don't know the answer to that. lemme get back to you :). there is a way to have admins manually add, but it's not exactly easy -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
