Le 06/10/2013 16:55, Wolfram Sang a écrit :
I'm not sure I understand why a Tested-by: would warrant the removal
of a Cc:.
To me, before I apply a patch to my trees, Cc: means "person got
notified of this patch". A tag means a person reacted to the patch, so
the information that she was notified is superfluous.
In all patches that were Tested-by: a given person, some might Cc: this
person, and some might not; now, if you remove Cc: because Tested-by: is
present and should be considered an implicit Cc:, then you create the
false information that the person would have been Cc: on /all/ patches
-- or, conversively, you lose the information of which patch the person
was really Cc: of.
IMO, a Tested-by: is the indication that someone tested the patch, and a
Cc: is the indication that someone was copy on th patch, and these two
are independent. Any simplification based on assumptions such as "a
tester was necessarily a Cc" should be performed by ad hoc filtering on
the client side, not by altering patches on the patchwork side.
Regards,
Wolfram
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
_______________________________________________
Patchwork mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
