On 8 February 2014 01:29, Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Have you ever worked for a 10,000+ employee organization? > > I know about such things, yet we shouldn't break patchwork which is > probably used by way more users. If your patch solves your issue, this > is great nonetheless.
Agreed, I don't want to break patchwork for everybody else. When I sent in the patch, I wasn't sure if there was a use case for patches in replies or not. That's why I asked for opinions. Now I know that there is. >> I my instance I don't need to worry about genuine patches being sent >> in replies, only comments. > > So, if you are running your own instance, you could keep this as an > out-of-tree patch? I'd think so, but it is up to Jeremy, of course. I'll do that if there isn't a better solution to my issue. I mostly figured that I'm probably not the only person to have run into this issue, so I wanted to see what other users of patchwork have to say. Maybe there's even a way to solve the problem for everyone. Regards, -Markus -- Markus Mayer Broadcom Landing Team _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
