On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 02:47:29PM +0100, Finucane, Stephen wrote: > > Bootstrap is a bit of a hammer and probably unnecessary for a site design > > as simple as this. It's a mostly-static website with little to no CSS3 and > > only the bare minimum of JavaScript. I also think it's a fair assumption > > that people using patchwork are working on PC-class devices with an > > evergreen browser. This means we're not taking advantage of the things that > > Bootstrap offers: responsive design, mobile first design, browser > > compatibility etc. I can find countless blogs that would suggest Bootstrap > > is pretty much unneeded in this case. > > This probably sums up my thoughts better than I can. It's an opinion piece > though and should be treated as such: > > http://fourword.fourkitchens.com/article/you-dont-need-bootstrap
As with everything, you can find opinion pieces on both sides, try searching "why should I use bootsrap blog"... The more important thing is where we want to go. For me, I want more modern UI, edit fields in place instead of the forms patchwork has right now, do ajaxy things and be usesable from my mobile phone so I can quickly review things on the go. All that need a solid CSS component base and plenty of javascript. Hence bootstrap. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
