On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 06:17:19PM +0100, Finucane, Stephen wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:58:47AM +0100, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > > From: Stephen Finucane <[email protected]> > > > > > > This includes adding a serializer plus the endpoint itself. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <[email protected]> > > > > As somewhat discussed, I'd really like to move away from the XML-RPC API > > in favour of a REST API. This also means not using the XML-RPC API for > > new features. I'll start some discussion on the ml about that this week. > > While this may be true, there has yet to be a decision on deprecating > the XML-RPC API in favor of a REST API. Until such a time as this > occurs, this is business as usual RE: the XML-RPC API. As such can you > review based and we can add REST API features as required should we > choose to follow that path?
I would if I agreed with the current schema proposal. Not quite the case I'm afraid. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
