On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:18:53PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > I think it's not a big deal if patchwork sometimes doesn't recognize a > new version of a series as being a new version, and leaves it to the > project admins to mark the old version of the series as superseded > manually. > > However, it is in my opinion much less acceptable to see patchwork > losing some patches. I'd rather have too much patches in patchwork that > I need to triage/classify/update rather than missing some contributions.
Agreed on both points. We did think about being able to edit series/revision when the parsing goes wrong, but, to be honest, that's not high on the priority list. I only know about a handful of bugs that will lead to losing a patch, so declaring the series support somewhat ready may not be that far away. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
