Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> writes: > 2016-09-07 10:42, Daniel Axtens: >> >> > --- a/requirements-prod.txt >> >> > +++ b/requirements-prod.txt >> >> > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ >> >> > -Django>=1.8,<1.10 >> >> > +Django>=1.8,<1.9 >> > >> > Unfortunately, the requirement <1.9 does not download Django 1.8 >> > but a release candidate of the version 1.9. >> > Is it the expected behaviour? >> >> That's weird - no, I wouldn't expect that. I can try to find a work >> around for that if it would be helpful. >> >> To be honest I would have thought production deployments would use >> distro packages rather than pip - have you considered that route? > > There are 2 issues with distro packages in my case: > - they are too old > - I use virtualenv to have a packaging separation between apps
Fair enough. I'm happy to figure out a patch or for you to do so. Regards, Daniel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
