>> - "untitled series #420" is certainly better than having every series 
>> named
>> "untitled series", but I still think it's worse than "series starting 
>> with
>> '[1/10] add foo to bar'"
> Should be trivial enough change. I wonder if we should save this into 
> the db on calculate it on the fly like I do for 'untitled series'? I'll 
> need to benchmark it and if the former is no slower, then this can be a 
> follow-up patch. If the latter is more performant, we'll need to respin.

So this is the only one I'm at all concerned about potentially needing a

You'd have to find the first patch in the series to work it out. I'm a
bit nervous that would be expensive.


>> I don't think all of this stuff would need to be included in the 
>> initial
>> implementation, and I think one of us would be able to work on it.  Are 
>> you
>> aware of anything here that would be backwards incompatible that might 
>> need to
>> go in now?  The only thing I can think of would be the series naming.
> Yeah, I'm doing all of this in my spare time so it's going to be tough 
> to address all of the above in one giant series (hence breaking it up). 
> Personally, I'd like to see us review the series as-is right now, with a 
> focus on the models and parser, then start building upon it with 
> follow-up patches. Thoughts?
> Stephen
> [1] https://github.com/justquick/django-activity-stream
Patchwork mailing list

Reply via email to