Hi, since a recent upgrade of patchwork in February I've observed patchwork misshandling patches sent as reply to another patch. An example is
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/15887/ where James' reply (first reply) was submitted like: [...] So I think something like this would be more correct. Does that fix your problem? diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c index 804d2a2a19fe..dd6a18bc10ab 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static unsigned int calculate_min_delta(void) } /* Sorted insert of 75th percentile into buf2 */ - for (k = 0; k < i; ++k) { + for (k = 0; k < i && k < ARRAY_SIZE(buf2); ++k) { if (buf1[ARRAY_SIZE(buf1) - 1] < buf2[k]) { l = min_t(unsigned int, i, ARRAY_SIZE(buf2) - 1); Thanks James [...] But then mangled into: [...] Thanks Jamesdiff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cevt-r4k.c ^^^^^^^^^ [...] James' archived original mail in mbox format is available at: https://www.linux-mips.org/cgi-bin/extract-mesg.cgi?a=linux-mips&m=2017-04&i=20170404203219.GK31606%40jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org the whole thread at https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2017-04/msg00035.html Ralf _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
