Jeremy Kerr <j...@ozlabs.org> writes: > Hi Ilya, > >> Ugh. Yeah, the checks/ requests are definitely something we can >> improve. Aaron is working on removing vast majority of this type of >> requests as we speak. Hopefully, that will be done soon. > > OK, sounds good! > >> Do you think it'll be fine to unban the robot once it doesn't run that >> many requests on the checks/ API in particular? (I expect the number >> of requests to be less than a 100-ish per day after the fix.) > > Yes, definitely. I'm okay with unbanning it sooner, if it's doing useful > stuff, and we can contain the load somewhat, and/or we need to test > against production data.
Thanks for help identifying the API usage - I've pushed a new series that should reduce it quite a bit. I'm hoping we can unban the RH robot. If it continues to show issues, we can address it as well. > (more that I wasn't sure if it was a legitimate use of the API > earlier, hence reducing the load via the nft rule) I've added a custom set of user agents so we can see that it is at least our set of patchwork polling / updating CI scripts. Hopefully that also will help to characterize if the robot is doing too heavy of a workload. >> That might be useful, thanks! > > OK, I will send that separately. Thanks! > Cheers, > > > Jeremy _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
