Thanks for calling this to our attention, Mike!
Eugene Wallingford posted this a couple of days ago:
For those who may have missed it... Christopher
Alexander did a 2-part interview with San Francisco
Chronicle art critic Kenneth Baker. The first
part:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/02/02/
DDG3MGVUL449.DTL&hw=alexander&sn=002&sc=829
There is a link to the second part in that page.
Linda
Dan Palanza wrote:
Hi Mike,
At 03:23 PM 2/14/2006, Mike Beedle wrote:
A Generative Theory of Similarity
http://web.mit.edu/~ckemp/www/papers/KempBT05.pdf
The
authors of this paper setup a statistical model in order to study
"Generative processes and similarity," (their words). Do
you believe that a statistical model is an effective way to study
similarity within and among generative processes?
If so, I
would enjoy hearing of your experience: how have you applied statistics
in SCRUM, for example. Otherwise, what improved study mode might you
recommend to one who studies the art of generative change?
Dan
_______________________________________________
patterns-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion
--
Author of "Fearless Change: patterns for introducing new ideas"
http://www.cs.unca.edu/~manns/intropatterns.html
|
_______________________________________________
patterns-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion