Kevlin,
I can see your point. However it probably doesn't apply to this specific case.
I'm just trying to clarify some comments/questions regarding the paper. I'm
trying to be very specific/detailed in term of my answers (just me). The main
purpose is to clearly convey the concepts behind the paper. In many cases, it
simply means that the information requires extra clarification. This is
especially true when dealing with abstract topics. BTW Clear/direct "messaging"
is probably best for this discussion.
There are many other factors involved as well. For instance, there are other
areas of the MDP messaging work that are not covered by this paper. One paper
is not enough. It is necessary to check the other references and the additional
papers to have a complete picture. Obviously people need to have all the
information so they don't miss anything. It is also fine to raise
questions/comments and ask for clarification.
I appreciate the comments that I have received so far. The content of the paper
has been improved as a result. People are welcome to express their
comments/recommendations/questions. In particular, if something is missing or
needs improvement.
Regards
_______________________________________________
patterns-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion
