Thanks for all the interesting discussion!
This reminds me somewhat of the discussion around naming in the good ol'
days :-)! Should the Mediator pattern be called
"Mediator" when the pattern is translated into other languages? If it is
translated, should it be translated into "Mediator" or
should a new name be chosen that better carries with it the intention of
the pattern -- and -- what if there is no word or even
an "easy phrase" that expresses the intention of the pattern?
On 2/19/2013 8:12 AM, Joseph Bergin wrote:
I've been suggesting to my students for years that they write patterns in the
YOU form, as if addressed to the person who must carry out the solution. I've
also suggested that the solution be stated strongly in an imperative form. Here
is a tiny excerpt, derived from the pedagogical pattern Round Robin. I'll leave
out much of it, just to get the flavor:
Round Robin
Context: You are teaching a course in which students are expected to learn
through their discussions...
Problem: You want all students to participate in a discussion.
Solution: Therefore, use a round robin technique to solicit suggestions.
I've always thought of this as a good form. However, I'm teaching the course again
and, as usual, learning a few things from my students. I have students from all over
the world. Some students from India and Pakistan questioned the use of the YOU form
for patterns. They say that it seems impolite to them, since the solutions are
imperative. There are language issues of course, with Urdu and Tamil having separate
you forms for use with different people. I think these words have different import
than the European versions (Usted, vs. tu). The European versions seem mostly to
represent "degree of association - strangers vs. family), or the German
impersonal forms (man), but it may be different (say, hierarchical) elsewhere.
As a result of the discussion, I've been playing with an I form (first person
singular rather than second person). For example:
Context: I'm teaching a course in which students are expected to learn through
their discussions...
Problem: I want all students to participate in a discussion.
Solution: Therefore, I use a round robin technique to solicit suggestions.
The rest of the pattern would need to be changed to match, of course.
What do you think about all this? Have you heard this in your travels or
pattern writing/usage? The I form doesn't sound as strong to me, but
interesting. What advice would you give to pattern writers in this area?
Linda Rising suggested I post this here, and Jutta gave good advice that she
may want to repeat here.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Joe
PS. I'll be wanting three good shepherds pretty soon, also. Let me know,
privately, if you are interested.
---
Joseph Bergin, Professor Emeritus in Residence
Pace University, Computer Science, One Pace Plaza, NY NY 10038
EMAIL [email protected]
HOMEPAGE http://csis.pace.edu/~bergin/
---
you shall above all things be glad and young.
For if you’re young, whatever life you wear
it will become you;and if you are glad
whatever’s living will yourself become
- - e. e. cummings
_______________________________________________
patterns-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion
--
Co-Author of Fearless Change: patterns for introducing new ideas
http://www.fearlesschangepatterns.com
Check out my new web site
http://www.lindarising.org
_______________________________________________
patterns-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion
