Phillip,

Yes I was. Per my earlier emails let's focus on what is relevant today in terms 
of the technical substance/merit of the papers. I'm afraid, I'm starting to 
sound like a politician running for office or a gossip columnist. :-) No point 
in confusing the relevant technical issues/approach by going on a tangent. I 
hope it is clear what the focus of this discussion is.

Regards,

Al








Van: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] namens Messaging Design Pattern 
[[email protected]]

Verzonden: zondag 9 juni 2013 21:13

To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]

Onderwerp: [patterns-discussion] Concepts and a Realistic Information Model









Dear List members,





I hope you are all doing well. Please find enclosed a link to a draft discussing

Concepts and a Realistic Information Model:



https://sites.google.com/site/concept12345678/concept/Concepts.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1



A compilation of papers can be found at



http://sites.google.com/site/concept12345678/concept/Realistic.doc?attredirects=0&d=1



The draft includes several new sections and revisions based on the feedback 
that I have received:





- Model evaluation and Metrics (includes references to

empirical studies)

- References (revised)

- Mathematical Model



By the way, I found a couple of references that seemed interesting (better late

than never):



“We can note in passing that one of the biggest problems in the development of

object-oriented SW architectures, particularly in the last 25 years, has been an

enormous over-focus on objects and an under-focus on messaging (most so-called

object-oriented languages don’t really use the looser coupling of messaging, but

instead use the much tighter gear meshing of procedure calls – this hurts 
scalability

and interoperability).” Alan Kay et al.



Tighter gear meshing of procedure calls has also been characterized as “The 
complex machinery of procedure declarations” while discussing problems 
associated with traditional APIs [26].   




I've been receiving good feedback on the overall effort:



"The [Conceptual] approach is very interesting, relevant, and can be applied

to several different CS topic areas/courses."



"Applying Biomathematics and Philosophy to software engineering models and 
programming languages is a novel concept."



"The goal of finding new uniform bases for computing is laudable ..."



I'm also working on a book publication. The publisher has asked me to

provide a list of potential reviewers for a book proposal.



The scope of the effort is limited to one-page questionnaire regarding

the proposal.  If you are interested in participating,  please contact me via 
email.

I'd really appreciate it .



As usual, please keep making your questions/comments as specific as possible. 
This allows me to send appropriate  responses. Feel free to quote specific 
sections

of the draft.



Best regards,



Al














_______________________________________________
gang-of-4-patterns mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gang-of-4-patterns


    
_______________________________________________
patterns-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/patterns-discussion

Reply via email to