mOses,

What I found with Checkpoint/Pointsec FDE is that it does not work
regardless if WIL is enabled or not. I had originaly thought it did work
when WIL (auto pre-boot login - urg) was enabled but it acts differently
once the system is encrypted. Checkpoint FDE is reboot tolerant during its
encryption process so it worked fine up until it reached 100%.

My thought is that the tool may need to read the disk to determine what it
is going to load into memory, win xp, 7 or linux (i don't know enough about
how it works to know for sure) Once it is encrypted its a non starter.

Does LUKS encrypt the whole drive with a pre-boot auth or does it leave
enough behind unencrypted for kon-boot to determine what to load?

D



> -----Original Message-----
> From: mOses <[email protected]>
>
> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:17:32
> To: PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List<[email protected]
> >
> Subject: Re: [Pauldotcom] Kon-Boot on a USB
>
>
> Well I can tell you that it will work again active directory accounts
> HOWEVER when you read the documentation and in your testing what
> you'll find is that since the credentials entered do not match the
> active directory network credentials you don't have access to network
> resources. It would seem to me that what this does is that it will
> patch the system in memory in order to tell the local system service
> (or winlogon) that your username did match what was in the LSASS
> process (or something to that).
>
> Now what I was trying to prove was that it will work when WIL (windows
> integrated login; meaning no actual password prompt in the FDE/WDE in
> pointsec is required).
>
> now secondly and more interestingly I tested this on an encrypted
> debian system by entering the decryption password (which is different
> than root) and it worked! (kon-usr was able to login!).
>
> So basically COLD-BOOT attack against LUKS + Kon-Boot on ubuntu/debian
> will work.... scary.
>
> M
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:27 PM, PJ Velasco wrote:
>
> > I use PGP Desktop 9.10 full disk encryption on a Windows XP SP3 laptop
> > and it did not work because I got the PGP prompt to unlock the disk
> > after the initial KonBoot splash screen.  I entered my PGP password to
> > continue the boot process, but I had to enter my actual Windows
> > credentials at the Windows login screen to successfully log in, so no
> > go even if someone knows the PGP password.  I also have an Ubuntu 9.10
> > laptop running disk encryption and the result was just like the PGP
> > result.  I successfully got it to work on a Debian system (VMware
> > guest), but not my Fedora Core system (again VMWare guest).  Very
> > sweet tool.  I showed all the guys at work and they loved it.
> > Tomorrow we are going to see if it will work with an Active Directory
> > account.  I have only tested with local accounts.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:16 PM, mOses<[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >> Just wanted to put my 2 cents on testing for everyone on the list
> >> interested.
> >>
> >> Kon-Boot on a Windows XP SP3 box w/ TrueCrypt WDE (FDE) did not work.
> >> Gave me an error about the BIOS being to big and that it wanted me to
> >> change the motherboard(?)
> >>
> >> Kon-Boot on a Windows Vista Business running PointSec for PC (server/
> >> client edition) with Windows Integrated Login (which I don't enjoy
> >> having) did not work either. Dies right before the OS loads.
> >>
> >> Irongeek USB Boot did not work at all on that box it hung at a place
> >> before that (loading the Pointsec system).
> >>
> >> Anyone else try with Bitlocker or another type of FDE/WDE like PGP
> >> enterprise?
> >>
> >> I think the author can fix these issues or if he opens the source
> >> someone else may do it, although it was all written in TASM32 so
> >> probably only those who remember what TSR programs were can do it :)
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pauldotcom mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> >> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pauldotcom mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to