Point taken but there are safeguards to ensure that the data hidden by steg cannot be easily detected, i.e. encrypting the steg payload. While this introduces a whole new set of issues, it doesn't mean that we cannot adopt a stego "standard" to transfer data.
"The path to hell is paved with good intentions." On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Grymoire <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >I believe the primary reason for this may be the lack of an agreed > >industry standard, protocol, or application that implements steg. > > This would be an oxymoron. > > If it's well documented, standardized, or understood, then it isn't > very good stego, IMHO. > > After all, if you can detect it, it has already failed i's primary purpose. > > There are commerical stego packages used in Photoshop/Elements. There > is the Digimark watermark plug-in for example. It can detect and > insert watermarks in a photo. > > _______________________________________________ > Pauldotcom mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com >
_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
