Hi, I would agree with Tim with the All-in-one solutions are not always the best way to go. There is a large caveat though with going this route and that is some products don't work with other products. So, if you are going to do a staged approach to a non all-in-one solution test all the products together at the same time so you know the end result is a solid solution.
I also have a vote for PGP. Good product and very good support. Cheers Duncan 2009/10/21 Tim Mugherini <[email protected]> > I would be cautious of all in one solutions. While it is a pain to > mngt multiple solutions, often the stand alones are more comprehensive > and stable. > > I have no experience with the product you are using so just my opinion > based on general experience. > > Also consider post xp sp2 firewall mgmt via GPO is a breeze. Win7 adds > even more and so far testing is solid. > > Xp sp3 and beyond adds GPO support for 802.1x and vista/win7 nap. Its > not without its quirks but most NAC implementations regardless of > vendor take some planning, testing, and patience - rinse and repeat > > Pgp wde is solid but expensive few limitations but their support Is solid > > If you end up looking at any of these, ping me and I can save you > shi... ton of time with some details and experiences > > That goes for anyone on the list > > > > On 10/20/09, Robert Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We use ESET and I would not recommend this for anyone, I have passed > known > > virus files passed it that Symantec caught and I don't think very highly > of > > Symantec. > > > > For a HIDS solution look into http://www.ossec.net/ we are testing it > and so > > far it is turning out to be nice. > > > > We also use Truecrypt for encrypting containers and store important files > in > > that container. There are ways around it but works well enough for what > we > > use it for, I have not done extensive testing on the whole disk > encryption > > but I know others here have. > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > - Robert > > (arch3angel) > > > > Aaron Appelbaum wrote: > >> > >> Hello List, > >> > >> I am evaluating migrating to a new AV/endpoint solution for my > enterprise. > >> We are a Microsoft/AD shop. I was hoping that the list would share their > >> frustrations, successes, and opinions with some of the endpoint > solutions > >> that are currently on the market. I have listed below the features that > we > >> may or may not utilize, ordered by their importance level. > >> > >> The solutions that I am currently testing include Sophos, and ESET. Is > >> there anything negative that you have experienced with Sophos or ESET? > >> > >> Features in Order of Importance > >> 1. AV protection > >> 2. Spyware protection > >> 3. Reporting > >> 4. Ease of policy configuration > >> 5. Firewall > >> 6. HIPS/HIDS > >> 7. Encryption > >> 8. NAC > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Aaron > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pauldotcom mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom > >> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > _______________________________________________ > Pauldotcom mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com > >
_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
