If you do not require an optical scanner then I guess a barcode could look a
lot less like a traditional black and white one, so making it harder to
detect with the naked eye. If you divide each bar into a %age of the image
width and use the largest RGB component value then you could have a
multi-colour barcode with some tolerance to resizing. Shrinking is obviously
going to reduce the amount of information and may be lossy but enlargement
ought to be OK.

Jim

2010/1/27 Adrian Crenshaw <[email protected]>

> Bar codes could work, but I want only the computer to see the stego, not a
> human. If I use a barcode, won't it show to the user?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Rob Fuller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Agreed about the EXIF data, but are you only talking about binary
>> steganography? You can hide barcodes in images pretty simply that
>> would survive resizing just fine. Also, are you talking human or
>> computer legible stego? Peoples choice of stego is highly dependent on
>> message size,message contents, repetition, and placement.
>>
>> --
>> Rob Fuller | Mubix
>> Room362.com | Hak5.org | TheAcademyPro.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Jim Halfpenny <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Image metadata may survive (EXIF, copyright strings), it really depends
>> on
>> > how the program manipulating the image handles the image and metadata
>> parts
>> > of the file. Chances are if the hidden data is in the image data then it
>> > will not survive resizing, changes to colour deptt, colour maps etc.
>> >
>> > Jim
>> >
>> > 2010/1/27 Adrian Crenshaw <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>     Does anyone know of any image based steganography that survives
>> >> resizing of the image? I'm looking into using blind drops, but many
>> sites
>> >> alter images that they post.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Adrian
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pauldotcom mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> >> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pauldotcom mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pauldotcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
>> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pauldotcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
> Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
>
_______________________________________________
Pauldotcom mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom
Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com

Reply via email to