My current proposal is using Thunderbird with Enigmail plugin/Gpg, running via Portable Apps on Ironkey. Truecrypt partitions inside another encrypted partition whenever possible too.
On 6/25/13 4:23 PM, Oleg Laskin wrote: > I would never recommend anyone to have third-party hold the private key. > Privates should stay private. :) > > Have you looked at GPG ? http://www.gnupg.org/ > > It has multi-platform support and is free. > There is a windows-based software using GPG called GPG4Win > ( http://www.gpg4win.org/ ) that provides encryption, email software and > includes an Outlook plugin. > I've used it in the recent past and it seemed to do the job nicely. > > Oleg. > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mrs. Y. > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > 1. Free/cheap > > 2. The private key can't be held by a 3rd party that may have to produce > it to the feds without notifying owner. > > 3. VERY secure. It's my understanding that the IBE implementation from > Voltage, while functional and easy to use, has some security issues. > > current proposed solution: Thunderbird with Enigmail plugin via portable > apps on Ironkey. > > > > > On 6/25/13 4:01 PM, Oleg Laskin wrote: > > I am curious as to requirements: Are they looking for end-to-end > > encryption internally or with select clients or with everyone ? > > > > IBE seems to provide an option for an on-site gateway as well as > > cloud-based one: "... Voltage SecureMail can be deployed > on-premise, or > > delivered as SaaS from the Voltage SecureMail Cloud™ ..." > > > > I have used Cisco's Ironport Mail gateway with encryption options > in the > > past: it works but I am not a fan. > > > > Symantec has a PGP-based solution. Requirements may help narrow it > down. > > > > Oleg. > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Mrs. Y > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > I'm in a position to recommend/suggest an encryption solution > for email. > > The audience is *very* sensitive to privacy, but not very > technical. IBE > > seems to solve this, but there are concerns with the PKG > (private key > > generator) being in the cloudl. Thoughts? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pauldotcom mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom > > Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
