(somewhat late response) A center frequency and channel width is functional equivalent to start/stop frequencies. So is channel number, with ref to channel number assignment scheme. For a requirements document, we just need to specify what is needed. How it is encoded (Hz, wave length, channel ID) is solution space.
Seen our goal to make PAWS somewhat universal (not limited to US TVWS), I do not prefer using channel numbers. Teco Op 9 aug. 2012, om 21:55 heeft <[email protected]> <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > Folks, > > During the last F2F meeting, there was an agreement to make a slight update > to requirement D.7 in > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-06.txt, to > make channel numbers optional to be supported. Ie, change the current D.7 > “The Data Model MUST support specifying a list of available channels. The > Data Model MUST support specification of this information by channel numbers > and by start and stop frequencies. The Data Model MUST support a channel > availability schedule and maximum power level for each channel in the list.” > to > “The Data Model MUST support specifying a list of available channels. The > Data Model MUST support specification of this information by start and stop > frequencies and MAY include channel numbers. The Data Model MUST support a > channel availability schedule and maximum power level for each channel in the > list.” > > I’d like to confirm this change on the list. If anyone has any objections, > let me know. Otherwise I’ll plan to send the document to the iesg after this > change is implemented. > > - Gabor > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
