In my experience with the IETF at the final levels of RFC acceptance
they reject duplicate implementations of objects or protocols. We tried
that with CALSCH, (xml and iCal/vCard format).
They rejected it in both formats. We had to pick only one. In a separate
draft that never went
to RFC status we proposed a translation guide (iCal data translation
to/from XML). However
only one could be the 'standard' format.
I mostly just follow this WG. I would suggest that the WG leads check
with the IETF to make sure that they will accept a specification that
has 2 formats for the same data.
-
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
