Hi All,

We have submitted a draft for the PAWS protocol specification that
represents a merge of the non-controversial portions
of the two documents presented at the Vancouver F2F. You can find it at:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vchen-paws-protocol-00

Summary of changes:
 - Be more explicit about required vs optional vs "depends on regulatory
domain"
 - Describe the "Data Models" in a more hierarchical fashion and making it
more clear
   where extension points are located to address regulatory differences
 - General replacement of "channel" with "frequency" or "spectrum", when
   appropriate.

This version does not include message encoding or specific error codes.

-- 
-vince
Vincent Chen
Google, Inc.
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

Reply via email to