Hi Yang, It seems to me that when advocating issues that have been agreed upon otherwise before, at this late date, will need a formal proposal before any adoption takes place so the members have time to go through your presentation and again be able to respond via the reflector. Case in point…certificates/TLS…my recollection is that many discussed this for a long time and it was not excepted in the proposal. What is the thought process for changing this now and can you elaborate on why each area of change, needed or already decided against is in your presentation asap so there can be a proper proposal timeframe with members able to give such ideas its due time and questions on the PAWS reflector starting now, it may be of help to all of us, and in some cases be a help to the total effort.
Thanks, Nancy On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Cuiyang wrote: > Hi, Gabor and Brian > > We would like to ask for a time slot for introducing our > draft-wu-paws-secutity-01. > > Thanks, > Yang > ================== > Yang Cui, Ph.D. > Huawei Technologies > [email protected] > > > ================== > Yang Cui, Ph.D. > Huawei Technologies > [email protected] > > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 > [email protected] > 发送时间: 2012年10月24日 5:32 > 收件人: [email protected] > 主题: Re: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta > > If you would like a timeslot to present in the upcoming F2F, please send a > request to the chairs. > Thanks, Gabor > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bajko > Gabor (Nokia-CIC/SiliconValley) > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:51 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [paws] F2F session at IETF85 in Atlanta > > Folks, > > FYI, I just requested a 2.5 hour session for PAWS at the Atlanta meeting. > > - Gabor > > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
