Thanks Rex. This is a important clarification that I agree we should keep in mind (and keep our options open).
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Rex Buddenberg <[email protected]>wrote: > Tony, > > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 08:07 -0800, Anthony Mancuso wrote: > > changed "channel" availability references to "spectrum" availability > > where appropriate > > I don't think we want to grasp this one in this version, but keep the > extensibility options open: most of the protocols that we'd imagine in > this space use TDMA MACs (IEEE 802.16, TIA LTE, ...). So 'availability' > might not be different channel or spectrum, but rather an unused > timeslice. > >
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
