I',m not sure I can turn around the doc by tomorrow since there are some technical points I need to collaborate on.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rosen, Brian <[email protected]>wrote: > I think if Tony can spin a rev before EOB tomorrow, we should do that, but > I'm thinking that the current rev is good enough, and I'd prefer to get it > into the Feb 7 telechat. > > I don't feel very strongly about that, but… > > Brian > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Pete Resnick <[email protected]> > wrote: > > One hitch: If you make the call by EOB tomorrow, I can get the Last Call > sent out, which means (assuming the LC goes well) I can get it on the IESG > telechat Feb 7. If we have to wait two additional weeks until the Feb 14 > telechat, it's not a huge deal, but we have to say "go" or "no go" to the > Last Call by EOB tomorrow for me to sneak it on to the earlier telechat. > > pr > > On 1/23/13 4:04 PM, Anthony Mancuso wrote: > > Good suggestion Gabor. I will wait another day or so and then start on > generating a new version in response to the comments and clarifications. > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:55 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My suggestion would be, if Tony has the time and willingness, then >> generate a new version and try to address these comments, perhaps taking >> the clarifications from Peter (and any input from others if available until >> tomorrow) into consideration. >> >> Thanks, Gabor >> >> > -- > Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> > <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 > > _______________________________________________ > > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws > > >
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
