Our goal in the IETF is to be as widely applicable as we can within our charter, balanced against getting something done sooner rather than later.
That's probably not as helpful as you would like. I think LSA is in scope = we're definitely not limited to TV bands, and we're not limited to unlicensed spectrum. brian From: Hassnaa Moustafa <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, February 7, 2013 1:32 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [paws] Spectrum Sharing Hi Brian, Gabor and all, I read the last use-cases draft (draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-12.txt) and the recent version of the protocol draft, and I notice that the use-cases focus on White Spaces utilization. I have a couple of questions: - Does the WS database aims to consider the TVWS only or any other frequencies (WiFi, cellular, ... for instance)? - In the charter of the WG, the scope is on WS utilization, would the PAWS protocol under progress be applicable to (LSA: Licensed Share Access) also or would be limited to the WS? Thanks in advance. Regards, Hasnaa
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
