I'd like to comment some of Sanjeev's input. I prefer to send independent replies on each topic, as that way a given email thread is about a single topic (more or less).
Sanjeev mentioned: From: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 10:31 AM [...] 2. It will be a good thing to include 'timestamp:string requirted' paramter in all the protocol transactions [...] I don't see the purpose in this. I don't see how the operation of the Database - or the way it will respond to any given request - is dependent on it knowing what time the Device thinks it is. (Or vice versa.) Unless someone can point out a use case for this field, I consider it unneeded "chatter" in the protocol. That said, the Database or Device can easily ignore it, so I won't push back if others believe this field is generally useful. Dan
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
