Izwe Lethu!!

Majoni I think it is high time that we accept that there's  always been 
problems in the organisation. At this juncture realy we should be able to deal 
with them. Maybe the following might help in triggering a clear sober political 
retrospection. When Payco was formed it was not accepted with the resoan that 
our struggle is being betrayed even more by the then president Mr Mlamli 
Makwetu. Some comrades even wanted his head. It is a blind lie to say Azanyu 
formed Payco. It was the convention that was held which proposed the name 
change as there was a faction which uses the name Azanyu (The Revolutionary 
Watchdogs). This did not go well with most of the comrades who were neither 
Watchdogs. Ultimatetly Payco was accepted after a lot of debates and 
mudslinging. Now the same is happening and what do we do? It is a fact that 
Alice congress took a resolution to change Payco to Pacyl. It is a fact that 
this Alice congress according to the courts of this country
 seems to have been nullified . Here comrade we are talking about NEO 
COLONIALIST oriented courts of law which of cause will never serve the 
interests of the PAC nor has authority over the decisions of the PAC.  
If we are to built this organisation we should take into consideration the 
above and other factors not listed above. That is we should accept that the two 
factions exist. PACYL exist by the resolution of Alice congress and PAYCO exist 
by the resolution of the courts of this country. PAC Congress is the highest 
decision making body. This suggest if there was any agreement it remains 
binding to all (Payco,Pawo,Pasma and all other PAC structures).
Comrades should tell us if ever the Alice congress was eligitimate and when was 
it eligitimate? Before the congress or after the congress, before the courts 
decisions or after the courts decisions? I think this will help clear some of 
us comrades who are blinded by the dust that the two fuctions are causing.
Lastly comrades errispective of whatever Payco should accept and respect the 
fact that Pacyl exist and the same with Pacyl should accept that Payco exist. 
The two formations should try to find common grounds to agree and a common 
solution to be formulated. 

Viva and long live to the United PAC youth wing.




________________________________
From: Lucky Khoza <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2009 2:57:52 PM
Subject: [PAYCO] Fwd: PAYCO NATIONAL CONGRESS DOCUMENTS


My dear comrade Khuliso,I find it disheartening to hear this kind of
iresponsible utterances from a comrade of your nature and
calibre.First and for most

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lucky Khoza <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:57:05 +0200
Subject: PAYCO NATIONAL CONGRESS DOCUMENTS
To: [email protected]

My dear comrade Khuliso, I find it disheartening to hear such kind of
irresponsible utterances from a comrade of your nature and calibre.
First and for most will you be able to tell when was PAYCO disbanded i.e
(day/date, time, venue), obviously no you cannot. PAYCO as a structure
must be thoroughly consulted for such an action to take place, you do
not wake today and feel excite and just try to disband a structure. It's
the thinking and the actions like yours that put the PAC where it is
today. Forming parallel structures will never see the light off the day.
What you are saying remain a fairytale for you and your cohorts in your
own dreamland.



Do you really know that the process which led to the so called pacyl was
flawed and there for declared illegal by the courts? You are continually
acting in contempt of the courts by propagating such a structure. Common
sense tells that you are not in par with the latest developments in the
movement and in the country at large. With due respect Son of the soil I
never doubted your political orientation even for a single second, but
surprisingly you proved me wrong. What you are doing amount to a dog
barking at a moving car. Base on what you said noble son, I tend to
believe that you are not well informed.



PAYCO will exists as long as progressive force exists.





Regards,



Lucky Khoza


The views and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender of this message and do not necessarily
represent the views and opinions of the JSE. Consequently, the
JSE does not accept responsibility for such views and opinions
and this message should not be read as representing the views
and opinions of the JSE or constitute binding terms and conditions
without subsequent written confirmation and an authorizing resolution
where required. Each page attached hereto must also be read in conjunction
with this disclaimer and should any part of this message be unclear, the
issue should be clarified with the Company Secretary of the JSE.

Confidentiality note: The message is intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are notified
that any distribution, use of or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received the communication in error, please notify
the sender immediately.

JSE Limited, Reg. No. 2005/022939/06

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

Lucky Appreciate Khoza
+27 (0) 73 371 8233



      
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Sending your posting to [email protected]

Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected]

You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco

Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to