<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71616>


Part of the Moneyweb network <http://www.moneyweb.co.za> 

Wednesday, 31 March 2010 

Home
<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71616>


|

Subscribe
<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71674>


|

Search Politicsweb:

 

The radical approach that we can adopt is to infiltrate the ANC League
communication group and refute false history and defend the
organization's position 

 

 

FRONT PAGE

FEATURES

 

NEWS

COMMENT

 

RESOURCES

SUBSCRIBE

home
<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71616>


RESOURCES

*  PARTY
<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71654>


*  DOCUMENTS
<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71656>


 

 

Home > Politicsweb > RESOURCES > PARTY 

PARTY

________________________________

 


The PAC remains irrelevant - Malema


Julius Malema 

27 March 2010 

 

Julius Malema calls for the correct history to be told about Sharpeville


 

The political implosion that today we have come to know as the
"Sharpeville Massacre" and commemorate as integral to Human Rights Day,
was a tragedy of unparalleled proportions in the struggle against
apartheid in South Africa. Never before had so many innocent and
defenceless people been senselessly killed since the Africans were
united under the banner of the African National Congress from 1912. Of
course, there were other battles with far many more people being killed,
with the famous Bambatha Rebellion of 1905 being amongst the last of
such rebellion against colonial oppression, but not at such a large
scale as the Sharpeville Massacre. This was nonetheless a beginning of
increased repression, leading amongst others to the events of June 1976,
when within a space of less than a year more than 1000 young people were
killed.

The magnitude of the massacre warranted direct condemnation of those
barbaric acts committed against defenceless peaceful protesters. As a
result, the question of what led to the massacre became obscured in the
international condemnation of those criminal murders committed with
impunity. Precisely because many people died on that fateful day, those
who claimed victory for the historical significance of the ultimate
sacrifice by ordinary people went on to do so unchallenged to this day.
In accordance with African customs, antagonistic debates are often
suspended in respect of the departed.

For years, the PAC perpetually made the claim that they are being
ignored by the majority party in Parliament, and that their historical
role in dismantling apartheid should accordingly be recognised. Amongst
such roles is the claim that they were behind the popular mobilisation
leading to the unfortunate Sharpeville massacre.

We do not intend to be history's revisionists. Neither do we as the ANC
intend to claim easy victories, for surely the death of 69 people on
what became Sharpeville Day was no easy victory! Indeed as some have
said, it was victory written in the blood of our people. That victory
saw amongst others, India's President Nehru acting against apartheid
South Africa.

But what is it that the PAC did leading to that fateful day? About three
years earlier in 1958, Robert Sobukwe led a breakaway from the ANC,
forming the PAC in 1959. The PAC was always a small splinter
organisation of disgruntled people who broke away from the ANC, just
like others such as COPE, albeit with the difference that they (PAC),
was more principled in the breakaway than the extremely hypocritical
COPE, as theirs (PAC) was based on policy differences with the ANC.

The build up of massive resistance in South Africa was undoubtedly led
by the ANC, and this was attested to by its popular support since the
political unbanning to the present. The ANC led in the Defiance Campaign
Against Unjust Laws in 1952 and mobilised the various sectors of our
population in the 1955 Congress of the People, hence our insistence that
the real Congress of the People is the ANC. In future, COPE will distort
this historical fact, and in fact the name was intended to imply that
deception.

There is no doubt that there have always been various ideological
strands in South Africa, even amongst the various forces fighting for
liberation from apartheid. However, these various forces were incapable
of unleashing massive resistance, hence they piggy backed on the
activities organised by the ANC and the Sharpeville massacre was no
exception. All those political organisations opposed to apartheid were
united in their rejection of the pass laws. At the opportunity of
mobilisation by the African National Congress of people around the
country, including Sharpeville, the PAC saw an opportunity to kindle
life into its own political activities by upstaging the events as
organised by the ANC. The ANC was mobilising the masses of our people
for a rally on the 31st March 1960. The PAC quickly organised a march
scheduled for the 21st, going door to door, distributed very misleading
pamphlets purporting that the march was organised by the "Congress". As
a result, many people were misled into thinking that the march was
organised by the ANC. The question that could be asked, is why did the
"Pan Africanist Congress of Azania", that is so evidently proud of its
distinguishing name chose to use the name "Congress" for what was to be
arguably its biggest political event since their formation in 1959? More
so when it was the ANC that often went under the name "Congress" or "the
Congress" or in isiZulu "uKhongolose"?

As it is, the Sharpeville Massacre remains an isolated incident in the
history of the PAC. There were no build ups to that fateful event,
neither were there events following that, except that the PAC was also
banned when the apartheid regime decided to ban the African National
Congress in 1960. The Sharpeville massacre finds proper locus in the
events organised by the ANC before and after the massacre itself.

Other historical figures confirm the view that the ANC was responsible
for the popular mobilisation that led to the opportunistic door to door
activities of the PAC in the morning of 21st March 1960. Amongst these
is Nelson Mandela in his "Long Walk to Freedom". If scholarly quotes and
references add value to truth, we know that Nelson Mandela would not
tell lies or claim easy victories!

Also, Alistair Boddy-Evans, in "The origins of the Human Rights Day",
make the following assertion:

"The PAC and ANC did not agree on policy, and it seemed unlikely in 1959
that they would co-operate in any manner. The ANC planned a campaign of
demonstration against the pass laws to start at the beginning of April
1960. The PAC rushed ahead and announced a similar demonstration, to
start ten days earlier, effectively hijacking the ANC campaign."

While Robert Sobukwe emphasised that the demonstration was to be
peaceful, Alistair Boddy-Evans further made the assertion that the PAC
leadership was in fact hoping for a violent response, if that be the
case, the only reason was again for the PAC to deliberately ensure the
shedding of blood so as to elevate their supposed importance in the
struggle for liberation. Then the ANC could not correct the situation
because everybody was grieving for the dead and in shock, but in
retrospect, Sharpeville must be properly located in the struggle as led
by the African National Congress, of course admitting to the bloody
opportunism that the PAC is.

In doing so, as the ANC we are neither revisionists nor opportunists
that tell lies and claim easy victories! Consequently, the ANC owes the
PAC no political elevation and no amount of grandstanding would turn the
tide against its dwindling support because its ideology was as
irrelevant in 1958 and 1959 as it is today. That is why the PAC has got
no support even in the areas where it claims to be its stronghold. But
like every other party, they too are mistaken in the hope that a
political collision with the ANC would give them a breath of life.

The correct history should be told to the youth of South Africa by their
own organisation which played pivotal role in the defiance campaign.

Julius Malema is the President of the ANC Youth League. This article
first appeared in ANC Today, the weekly online newsletter of the African
National Congress <http://www.anc.org.za/> 

Click here
<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71674>
to sign up to receive our free daily headline email newsletter

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minah Mochane

Buyer

Rand Water 

Bulk Water Distribution

Tel:011 724 9256

Fax:011 724 9221/011 900 1929

E mail:mmoch...@randwater.co.za

www.randwater.co.za

 

"When you feel like giving up,remeber why you held on for so long in the
first place".

 






The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended only 
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons 
or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received 
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any 
system and destroy any copies.

-- 
Sending your posting to payco@googlegroups.com

Unsubscribe by sending an email to payco-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco

Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com

<<inline: image005.gif>>

<<inline: image006.gif>>

<<inline: image007.jpg>>

<<inline: image008.jpg>>

Reply via email to