I doubt if this man calling himself to be leading party unity is genuine enough about his commitment for the sole of PAC. There is obviously a conflict of interest from your side and a misguided view to think that people will listen to you when you are the cause of the problem. To put it crudely Letlapa etal has lost credibility among PAC members, you can deny it but unfortunately that is the reality. you can boost your ego, justifying your actions and excuses for disunity but your arrogance on real issues will take you know where.
People will go to your Bantustan so called meeting with their eyes wide open not to submit and be trapped on hidden agendas. Go on with your lavish, authoritarian and dictartorial leadership style and that will take you know where and genuine PAC members will work on the ground and do PAC work as usual without your permission. We took a principled position last year in November for all PAC members to come back to the party and their are doing just that now and they do not need your dishonest blessings. I was reminded yesterday at the march of Palestine Solidarity Action by some of the teachings of Achmat Cassiem when referring to the book in 1998 political education " Search for meaning " identify the problem, what is the cause of the problem and solution to the problem. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Narius Moloto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The position of party building on party unity. > > > > Party building department of the party agree on the question of party > unity. > > > > However party unity must be understood in context. When we talk party > unity, we must first understand what is the party. > > > > The party is the structure of the party, namely the branches, regions, > provinces and the component structures, such as youth league, student, women > and etc. > > > > Party unity does not concern itself with individuals who operate outside > party structures and non-pac members. > > > > Pac belong to its structures and the basic structure of the PAC is the > branch. If you do not belong to a branch of the PAC, you exclude yourself > from the structures of the PAC including its component structures. It is so > because you cannot lead a party component structure unless you are a PAC > member and you belong to a branch. > > > > One of my responsibilities is to ensure that party structures are formed, > have programmes and are functional. I did not come across disunity in this > party structures. In other words there are no issues which divide branch > members. They are in fact united around party programmes. > > > > The same cannot said to be said with component structures. However this > should be understood in context as well. You do have people who are members > of the branches of the PAC, who do not accept the constitution and the > leadership of the PAC and are in fact not members of the PAC but claim by > the virtue of the fact that they once belonged to the PAC component > structures, in prison, in exile etc they don’t have to belong to the PAC > branches and have equal rights to the part structures. > > > > This people think they have the right to choose who become the president of > the PAC and that if they do not recognise the president of the PAC, them he > is not the PAC president. > > > > When the current president of the PAC took over the presidency he outlined > two main tasks. One is to take the PAC back to its rightful owners, which > are the branches of the party and two, to give PAC a shape. > > > > This means all party members must belong to the branches. No one must claim > to be a party member while he does not belong to a party branch. > > > > Two, the branches must have programmes with mass participation of their > communities. They must lead the communities in addressing their problems > and their needs. > > > > All genuine members of the PAC now belong to branches and are working at > their different branches. But you have those who refuse to belong to the > branches and participate in PAC programmes. Their main reason is that they > do not recognise the current leadership. > > > > The founding fathers of the PAC and the constitution of the PAC from its > inception highlight the branches as the basic structures of the > organisation. It is clear therefore that you cannot claim to love the PAC > and strive to unite the PAC which you are not its member. It is our argument > that party unity belongs to party branches and structures not people who > dispute party leadership and non party members. > > > > To call for a unity meeting you should have identified areas of disunity > and the level at which they exist. > > > > The dynamics of the alleged disunity in the party component structures are > as follows: > > > > *APLAMVA * > > In the Aplamva the root cause of disunity is political and its origin is > the formation of PAM. The section of Aplamva that is lead by Fihla belongs > to PAM. Majority of its leadership and membership belongs to PAM. In their > recent Ipelegeng Congress their main focus was on PAC president. They > attached the PAC president and resolved to isolate him as an individual. > > > > Their initial tactic was to take Aplamva away from PAC t oPAM and they > failed. The leadership of Fihla Aplamva are not PAC members and therefore > there are basis for unity discussions with them. We know what they are > interested on is the name of Aplamva. So that they can continue to source > project form government for themselves. This grouping is not really > interested in unity, their actions and programmes are aimed at undermining > and weakening the PAC as an organisation. > > > > Payco never recognised any president of the PAC and it only exist at > national leadership level. It does not have branches, regions and > provincial structures. It is composed of a group of individuals who focuses > on attaching and undermining the structures and the leadership of the PAC. > > > > Payco does not have a programme other than insulting and defaming the > programmes and the leadership of the PAC. They do not hesitate to form an > alliance with any one who is disgruntled with the PAC to haunch their > attach. > > > > PAC is having its youth league which accept both the constitution and the > leadership of the PAC. > > > > While party unity is important and must always be encouraged, we cannot > unite revolutionaries and reactionaries, members and non members without > seriously compromising the party itself. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf > Of *Masande Gonya > *Sent:* 28 May 2010 02:02 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [PAYCO] PAYCO VS PACyl ON SA FM > > > > Africanist we must be vigilant, the media is not right tool for now , > because it is controlled by western people. *MOST OF THE TIME WE SAY THAT*. > The masses are waiting for us out there, the facebook and google is not > going to bring unity within the party. > > > > We are not politicians, we are revolutinaries ma-afrika. The masses are > waiting for us, we must ask ourselves what do we want from achieve within > the space of time. > > > > Pan-Africanism is does not preach about disunity, it speaks about unity. > > > > I strongly feel PAC is the only solution to the current problems of africa, > what is required is members to unity. > > > > let us love one another, we must not be enemies. The dream of 1963, 25 May > it is still there. > > > > But we must be willing to change our personalities for the sake our people. > > > > I am not old in politics, but i see there is huge problem within the ranks > of our movement. > > > > I am currently doing my academic research on the politics of azania and > turn around strategy that can be used to get the opportunity to get support > from the masses. > > > > It nice to know what happen pre-1994, and that was mistake that was caused. > In a revolution if something didn't work out, there is a need to reshape and > move forward. > > > > I am currently reading Sun Tzu on the Art of War, I recommend to all > africanist to get hold of the book so that we can serve the people of this > continent. To debate seating in the chair, with your fingers in your > computer is not going to justice to people who are dying in and other. If we > can not change the government via democratic proccess (which i strongly > believe PAC was not supposed to engaging in) we are liberation movement not > a organisation of parliament or union buildings. > > > > The african cause will remain a cause. > > > > I remain an Africanist. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 28 May 2010 11:03, Phakamile Myakayaka <[email protected]> wrote: > > majoni ikhona ingxaki kwaye it is of gigantic propotion.i just listened to > safm and i am not happy at all.solution:let's all meet and iron our > differences in order to move forward as a strong force of african warriors > on a revolutionary march to total emancipation of amaAfrica, uPAYCO > makakhokhele i'm ready to loose blood for the african course IZWE LETHU! > > > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:49 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > I fully agree with you son there's no reason for us go public b'cause we > are still denting our own image.But as I said the other day certain > comrades in a road to score points > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > South Africa's premier free email service - www.webmail.co.za > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > For super low premiums, click here http://home.webmail.co.za/dd.pwm > > > -- > Sending your posting to [email protected] > > Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] > > You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco > > Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com > > > > -- > Sending your posting to [email protected] > > Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] > > You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco > > Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com > > > > > -- > “If you want to go fast, go alone; but if you want to go far, go together.” > Lineo Nalane (from Lesotho) in 2007 > > -- > Sending your posting to [email protected] > > Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] > > You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco > > Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2900 - Release Date: 05/27/10 > 20:30:00 > > -- > Sending your posting to [email protected] > > Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] > > You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco > > Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com > -- Sending your posting to [email protected] Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com
