Comrades
I have to say I've come to regard the Party leadership (especially between the 
years 1978 and 1985) with great respect for their valiant efforts to sustain 
the PAC's Mission in Exile and to maintain the continued recognition by the 
OAU, the UN and other world bodies when the Charterists, with their super-power 
backup, campaigned for sole representative of the aspirations of the people of 
South Africa.  The entire liberation movement and its various schools of 
thought were required to genuflect at the altar of the Lusaka head office of 
the African National Congress.  This battle which was lost in the corridors of 
the diplomacy was later translated into blood flowing in the streets of the 
townships where their satellites enforced sole recognition by decimating their 
own compatriots.  The crux of this story has not been effectively told, but it 
is an important element in the conspiracy of devious forces that suppress - 
time and time again - the rise of the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania.  
Whatever individual weaknesses that Vusi Make, David Sibeko and Elias Ntloedibe 
may have had, their victory after mobilizing the international community goes a 
long way.  Achieving that small victory goes a long way in the struggle against 
an imposed hegemony.
Advisers of the Charterist leadership have consistently driven for the 
achievement of this strategic goal to this day.  From this point of view, the 
centenary celebrations in 2012 have become a cog in the wheels of this 
stratagem.  They promote the notion that the ANC have monopolized the history 
of the liberation struggle and that their track record of scoring significant 
achievements have greater political power than those with less outstanding 
records.  People are duped to associate with their movement, to hero worship 
their leaders, and to interact with their programmes, with the hope that by 
association they will improve their circumstances and derive a better life 
sometime in the future. 
We have been inundated a year long with ululations for the generation of 
cap-in-hand deputations to King George in Britain, the puppets who sat in dummy 
institutions like Malan's Advisory Councils, colonial chiefs in the Old Guard 
leadership and turn-coats like Dr James Moroka.  The celebrants went on, using 
government resources like the SABC, to attempt to fool the public into 
believing that their history is of a continuing glorious performance.  What 
exposes them - despite all the resources and propaganda efforts - is the 
internal quandary about the leadership qualities of Jacob Zuma, and the ongoing 
struggles of the masses such as that which led to the Marikana killing fields.  
The centenary celebrations is underscored by this political irony.
Theoretically the strategy is best characterized as the Matthew Effect 
phenomenon:  the belief that success as a source of power and influence breeds 
further success.  It is derived from Matthew chapter 25 verse 29.  "Unto 
everyone that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance - but from him 
that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath."  The Matthew Effect 
is basically the concept that the rich get richer and poor get poorer, which is 
effectively what the ANC stands for.  Academics explain the phenomenon as an 
exercise of the kingpin getting disproportionately great credit and attention 
for the contribution of many others who are less known, basking in the glory of 
their achievements and taking them as his own.  The kingpin would be the hyped 
Nelson Mandela image.  He smartly tried to deny that his individual 
contribution does not overshadow that of his own comrades. However, he made the 
deal with the Nats on his own. he also said that when he gets to heaven he'll 
first ask for branch offices of the African National Congress.  Theologians and 
the clergy, in all faiths, failed to debunk this theory of a sectarian heaven, 
and kept quite like Egyptian mummies.  The media fixation with the African 
National Congress helped to sanitize the position that South African history of 
liberation struggle is the epic narrative of the African National Congress 
alone.  This is a cheap falsehood.
I do not undermine the impact of the Matthew Effect.  Those who are brainwashed 
believe in the invincibility of the rich and powerful.  They murmur their 
protest on the sides away from any eavesdropping but sheepishly sing the 
praises of the kingpins in the open.  An unbridled capitalist social order 
concentrates wealth in the hands of the few.  The productive forces are 
sidelined from enjoying the fruits of their work.  Instead the oligarchy 
associated with power are exclusively wealthy, and they buy and influence their 
own branches of political parties.  There is no genuine debate and discussions 
on priority matters of the day, and the plight of the masses is treated 
contemptuously and often scorned upon.  What rules is the effective influence 
of the rich, who stole from poor.  I however believe in the determined effect 
of the collective struggle and the objectives of the African revolution, and 
that despite the long road the masses will ultimately win.  I'd wish for those 
who collude with the status quo, consciously or otherwise, to spend a moment 
reflecting on their roles in the further decline of the Pan Africanist Congress 
of Azania.  As activists we must do something.
The PAC is guided by revolutionary Pan Africanism.  Early political theorists 
of the Party conducted themselves like Spartans.  They adopted a rigidly 
puritanical lifestyle and held faith in the palms of their hands.  Faith in the 
African people, that is.  They espoused virtues of simplicity, hard work, 
honesty, moral rigour, uprightness and an undying love of the masses.  AP Mda, 
a highly qualified lawyer, lived in the deep rural areas of Lesotho and served 
those who cannot afford the high costs of legal fees.  His son, Zakes Mda, 
could not bear to live like this and bolted against him.  Uncle Zeph, also 
highly qualified, dedicated his entire life to the African cause at the expense 
of the suffering of his family members and his son who suffered glaucoma and 
eventually went blind.  Pan Africanists do not have the Matthew Effect.  The 
authentic PAC cannot be bamboozled by the Matthew Effect.
By the bye, I am aware that my good old friend Matthew Phosa is the ANC's 
treasurer general.  He is also a very wealthy man.  Leina lebe seromo.  
Izwe lethu iAfurika
Jaki

                                                  

-- 
Sending your posting to [email protected]

Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected]

You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco

Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com

Reply via email to