Comrade Phillip Copeman

 

I still maintain PAC is relevant as articulated in the 1959 Pan Africanist
Manifesto, the Party mainly lacks the required organisational and political
capabilities to launch a political programme and strategy to seize state
political power. We must draw a distinction of PAC as a liberation party
forming part and advancing the revolutionary Pan Africanist programme to
overthrow capitalism and white supremacy. Surely seizure of state political
power should be any and all means necessary depending on objective reality
and this does not imply that as PAC we should always be obsessed about
elections since emancipation of the toiling and downtrodden masses of our
people as articulated by the five aims and objectives of the PAC stand as a
matter of principle and a daunting political task we should forge. The
illiterates and semi-illiterates being the African workers and peasants are
the motive force to achieve the Africanist Socialist Democracy, in
rebuilding the party, we should focus ourselves as to organisation of this
social grouping for total liberation of Africa on a socialist programme. 

 

As we speak today, the Roman Catholic Church has no Pope but the agenda and
work of the church continues undisturbed for through organisation the church
functions and works towards realisation of its objectives, drawing from this
lesson the African people need organisation through which the people’s and
the party’s will shall prevail, leadership will always from the execution
and organisation. We build organisation based on a programme aimed at
realisation of an Africanist Socialist Democracy, not the current
neo-colonial African oligarchy/comprador bourgeoisie system.

 

Your hype around 2014 national elections are misguided and your desire to
occupy the Union Building borders around what Chinweizu describe as natives
becoming new masters and perpetuate oppression and exploitation of the
African having taking over the seats of the unpopular oppressive and
exploiting groups. The hype around elections is also misguided when focus is
not based on resolving political and organisational maladies that dwarfed
and thwarts PAC’s political and organisational functioning including
effectiveness. Always when PAC members are supposed to reflect on the state
of the party and plan as to how we should rebuild and reorganise the party,
we are being flooded with national elections excitement and hype. 1994,
1999, 2004 and 2009 national elections PAC fared badly and these elections
thing has done enough damage, it is time we must sober up and take stock,
count losses and focus on what necessary actions we should take to rebuild
the PAC. 

 

Any public message resonates well when the carriers  comes from a solid
organisational base and secondly carriers with integrity, Western Cape for
example is highly divided. I think its being naïve to speak elections with
an ailing party incapable of defending itself and also that PAC has become
everything to everyone, this neo-colonial parliamentary election has
assimilated the aspirant nationalist bourgeoisie within the party to form
part of the oppressive and exploitative system. 

 

The neo-colonial parliamentary system has become another form of a pyramid
system in which the poor masses are used to vote for few people who will
then accumulate wealth and live in luxury while the vast majority of the
African people subjected in social degrading living conditions.  

You have selectively reduced the perspective I advanced to merely land issue
as in soil, whilst I summed the historical, political economic and social
economic development aspects. There has been a constant narrow approach and
contextualisation of the land issue which I do not support as I I summed in
my earlier submission.

 

Secondly PAC’s failure on national elections has less to do with the land
issue but a lot to do with mainly organisational aspects, political
programme and ideological orientation, these three key aspects are
dialectically related. Your elections approach fails to appreciate and
recognise the political organisation aspects of party. I worked very closely
with Cde Ata Kgosana and Cde Mosebjane Malatsi  in the PAC National
Elections Task Team (NETT) during the 1999 and 2000 elections, also the 2004
and 2005 elections PAC’s National Elections Authority (NEA).  

Thirdly, you have not made a concrete case about the irrelevance of the land
issue, a very elementary argument is that:-

1.         houses requires land for erection including creation of
residential areas. 

2.         food production requires land for both crop and stock farming; 

3.         Job creation requires land for mining and for industrialisation 

Its surely an argument of settler colonialism that Africans should not
bother themselves with the land question, while as Africans we consume what
we do not produce and that which we produce we do not consume. Our people
must be trained to understand and appreciate that land is a symbol of wealth
and a source for the realisation of a right to national self-determination.
Remember even Mao deployed cadres of the party to the countryside to drive
agrarian revolution and all developed societies advanced agrarian revolution
and later coupled it with industrialisation.  

 

I find your argument and statistics less convincing!

 

Shango lashu

 

For Pan Africanist revolution not nationalist bourgeoisie conformism and
revisionism

Nkrumah Raymond Kgagudi

 

From: Philip Copeman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 05 March 2013 11:11 AM
To: Nkrumah Raymond Kgagudi
Subject: Re: Making The PAC more relevant

 

You have written a very comprehensive argument for the Land issue whcih I
dismissed with "Its not relevant".

I still beleive that irrelelvancy is the biggest downfall of the Land
argument, but there is a also very strongargument, essentially Economics vs
Socialogy as to why it is not viable. It will take a few hours to lay it
out. Do you need to me to expouse this or can we leave this aside and get on
with winning the next elections? 

We can have the discussion once we get into the Union Buildings.

-- 
-- 
Sending your posting to [email protected]

Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected]

You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco

Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pan 
Africanist Youth Congress" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to