> > Perhaps but I assume you're not running Facebook on DropBox :) Certainly > there is still interesting use cases for RDBMS's and the engines therein. > InnoDB has caught up so much that PBXT no longer has the edge, but I still > find it very interesting. Were Paul to have the resources InnoDB does, I > suspect PBXT would be significant.
I agree with you. If there were more resources behind PBXT it could have been very interesting. I don't know how much of it is log-structured compared to the original design but I was very interested in that. I blame myself and others who didn't have time to help Paul get this to market. I suspect that PBXT still has advantages compared to InnoDB on multi-core servers. -- Mark Callaghan [email protected] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
