Yeah, Golddwave certainly isn't a bad program. I've never actually learned how to edit with it, but what i do is record with Goldwave and edit everything in sound forge. It just works best for me to have both on my system.
At 08:00 PM 9/23/2005, you wrote: >Hi Jamie, >Sounds like you have pretty much made your decision. >You felt SoundForge was a resource hog, and probably more program than you >need. >And Studio Recorder is not the only sound editor one will ever need, >so, it sounds like you're are left with GoldWave. >The price is right,and it is probably as much sound editor as you will ever >need, unless you plan to do some really specialized professional recordings. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jamie Pauls" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 11:08 AM >Subject: An Audio Decision That Requires Some Thought > > > > When it was first released, I purchased Sound Forge 6 with noise reduction > > and Jim Snowbarger's scripts. I have since decided that Sound Forge was > > probably a lot more program than I really needed. I also purchased Studio > > Recorder which I really like for certain projects that I have worked on > > over > > the past couple or three years. As those of you who have used it know, > > Studio Recorder will never be the only sound editor anyone will ever use; > > it > > has some very specialized features that are quite unique to it. > > > > On my 800MHz Pentium III computer, I found Sound Forge to be a real > > resource > > hog, and Jim's scripts didn't always behave as expected. No disrespect > > intended, Jim, if you're reading this. My old computer's sound card was a > > bit ornery anyway. > > > > I have recently purchased a Pentium 4 2.66GHz computer and have installed > > Studio Recorder. Now for my decision, hence my request for feedback from > > the > > list. I am looking at three options. > > > > 1. Install Sound Forge 6 with noise reduction. > > 2. Evaluate Sound Forge 8 and pay for the upgrade, approximately $150 if I > > read it correctly. > > 3. Download and evaluate Goldwave, and possibly pay $48 for yet another > > audio program. > > > >>From the standpoint of accessibility and footprint, which sound editor > >>would > > the majority of respondents suggest and why? Let's pretend that money is > > no > > object, which is certainly not the case. I have just promised myself that > > I'm not going to install and uninstall a myriad of software on this > > machine, > > so I want to plan my moves carefully. Thanks for all thoughtful responses. > > > > Jamie Pauls, MT-BC > > http://www.accesswatch.info > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > > http://www.pc-audio.org > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >_______________________________________________ >PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >http://www.pc-audio.org > >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
