I use an Edirol HR9, and although it's usable and somewhat accessible, it is certainly not as accessible as the Bookport Plus. Now that I have the Bookport Plus, I'm not sure I'll ever use the Edirol again.
Jerry Berrier Access Technology Consultant 18 Trunfio LN Everett, MA 02149 (508) 735-4420 E-mail: [email protected] Skype: jerry.berrier Web: http://www.birdblind.org -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Danny Miles Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 7:57 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Fwd: (blindo's inn) Digital Audio Recorders - Edirol R09HR vs Zoom H4N Hi everyone. Apologies if this is off topic, but I was told that a similar issue has recently been discussed here, so I'm acting in good faith. If the subject has already been exhausted on list, any private assistance would be much appreciated. My email address is [email protected] Best wishes, Danny ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Danny Miles <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 13:50:23 +0100 Subject: (blindo's inn) Digital Audio Recorders - Edirol R09HR vs Zoom H4N To: blindos-inn <[email protected]> Hi everyone. Sorry, another nerdy conversation on the way. I'm looking to purchase a new audio recorder, and am stuck between the Edirol R09HR and the Zoom H4N. Both look good for different reasons (the Zoom looks particularly good as I understand you can use different microphones to record different channels with it), but I'm not sure about how accessible they are. If anybody has used either of these machines, I'd be grateful for any info on features or accessibility which they'd be happy to share. If somebody has used or tried both, a comparison would also be really appreciated. Thanks as always, Danny -- To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [email protected]
