Well, like I say, I'm not bashing stuff either. I guess what I'm saying is that well, at least for me any ways, if you want to go geeky with a recorder like multi tracking, having it spit either 24 valt or 48 valt phantom power, I'ed feel more comfortable doing it with something that talks or something that has 1 button for every thing or short cut keys for things like the Sound-devices recorders do. Now thoughs are really my favorite ones, the thing is that they are thousands of dollars. I guess in the end all I'm saying is that I guess that something like this LS-100 is easyer and mor convenient then say a Zoom H4N for instance.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 6:34 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Audio Recorders I'm not knocking the Olympus recorders as I'm sure they're great pieces of equipment but some people seem to have a "thing" about talking devices for some reason and they seem to automatically figure that just because they talk then they're better than devices which don't <smile>. If you want to hear Olympus recorders in action then go to <http://www.blindcooltech.com> and "listen away", plenty of podcasts there on Olympus recorders. Points taken, that's why I bought my Zoom H1, no its not multi track but I didn't need one of those. No it doesn't talk but if I can use a cassette recorder then I can use a Zoom H1, think I paid $100.00 for it over a year ago, an absolute bargain. On 24/12/2011, at 10:23 AM, kim kelly wrote: > I bet those Olympus recorders cost an arm and a leg and a few fingers. LOL. > All jokes aside, they do cost quite a bit of money and it is hard for someone who is on a limited income to purchase one. > I would love to hear one of the Olympus recorders in action as well. > > > Kim McNatt-Kelly > Alternate email: > > [email protected] > > Skype: > > richies12 > > Anyone who wants to get a hold of Richie My Other half, email him at: > > [email protected] > > Or: > [email protected] > > We enjoy communicating with anyone who would like to and who needs help with computers and blindness related issues. > > Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan" > <[email protected]> > To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 12:31 PM > Subject: Re: Using iPot Touch or iPhone as portable recorder. > > >> What's that got to do with everything? Weren't we talking about using an iPod touch as a recording device? >> >> I'll wait till I see this new Olympus recorder before making any comment, don't want to jump the gun as so often happens these days on email lists <smile>. >> >> >> On 24/12/2011, at 7:14 AM, Hamit Campos wrote: >> >>> Aha, but you see, I mean the ZooomH1 is cool for what it is, but the >>> LS-100 will have phantom power and all that studio stuff apparently, >>> and it'll talk. So yeah, it'll be very cool. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] >>> On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan >>> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 3:03 PM >>> To: PC Audio Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: Using iPot Touch or iPhone as portable recorder. >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> My favourite subject <smile>, I've been down that road before. >>> >>> I use Fire Field recorder though it hasn't been updated for quite some time. >>> >>> Now here's where things become a little tricky. If you're using Fire >>> Field Recorder for quality recordings you'll want some external >>> microphones and inputs, that's fine! as those devices exist but when >>> all boiled down, its going to cost you a little money, not expensive mind but a little money. >>> >>> If I had my time over again, I would not have bothered buying the >>> extra attachments for my IOS device, they're nice sure! but for >>> nearly the same amount of money I could have bought a portable >>> recorder which does far more than the IOS device I had was capable >>> of doing, I'm talking of course of the Zoom H1 portable recorder. >>> >>> No, it doesn't have talking this or talking that, no it doesn't have >>> bells and whistles to write home to Mum about but it is! a very high >>> quality and easy to use recorder which handles MP3 and Wave format, >>> encoding quality for >>> MP3 can be set along with sampling and bit rate for Wave. >>> >>> >>> On 24/12/2011, at 6:03 AM, Dave Scrimenti wrote: >>> >>>> The Olympus portable recorders have been discussed a lot lately, >>>> and I >>> could buy one of those. But I already have an iPod Touch, and was >>> wondering about just using that as a portable recorder. The built-in >>> mic isn't very good, but sufficient for most voice recordings. Is >>> there a high-quality external mic available? and, is there a >>> recording app that's accessible, and more full-featured than the >>> very simplistic voice memos app that comes with it? >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [email protected] >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [email protected] To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [email protected]
