Hi, Dave Ward has raised a Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp during IESG review.
It reads... == It would be very helpful to put a listing of policy attributes that are under consideration in a section before the scenarios. The scenarios are very helpful as examples but, they are limited in their usefulness to understand what attributes and constraints are to be used to create policy. The doc is theoretical enough on the discussion of policy that it becomes unclear the actions that are to be taken. There is also little discussion on the policy distribution mechanism when the PCC is separated from the PCE. It would seem an important part of the framework and some more text is required to understand what is necessary. There are statements that COPS is not required but, it is referred to throughout the doc. If it is not required what is another technique that could be used, recommended or is going to be followed in the WG? == You can see a copy at https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp/comment/80085/ Do the authors have any thoughts on how to respond? Cheers, Adrian _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
