> > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > > Adrian Farrel > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:40 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds > > > > Hi, > > > > Following up some actions from Dublin... > > > > Can you please express an opinion on whether the following > thress I-Ds > > are ready to be /should be adopted as PCE working group I-Ds. > > > > draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension > > draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req
In favor for both. > > draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list > > Absent. > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
