Dear fellow PCE working group participants, As discussed at the PCE WG meeting at the 74th IETF meeting in San Francisco we'd like to get feedback on the document: "draft-lee-pce-ted-alternatives". This document examines alternative and supplementary approaches to creating and maintaining the Traffic Engineering Database (TED) used by a PCE. In addition, the document examines areas for potential standardization within these alternative approaches. This document does not extend or alter any existing protocols or dictate a particular approach.
The benefits of this document to the PCE working group include: (a) Further elaboration with examples of the concepts presented in section 4.3 of the PCE Architecture document (RFC4655). (b) Compares various approaches to achieving the concepts of section 4.3 of RFC4655. (c) Points the way for possible future standardization work. The eventual goal would be for this document to become an informational WG document/RFC. Best Regards Young and Greg ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:07:18 -0500 From: "Bardalai, Snigdho" <[email protected]> Subject: [Pce] Comments on draft-lee-pce-ted-alternatives-01.txt To: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi I believe capturing this information is important in order to attain a consistent behavior for the PCC and PCE implementations. Also, this provides engineering guidelines for system design. Given that I would propose that we either add solution options to this ID or create a separate one. Thanks, Snigdho _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
