I got it. Thanks for your explanation.


Thanks

Yuanlin


--------------------------------------------------------------------

[email protected] 写于 2009-05-20 16:19:17:

> [As an individual and co-author]
> 
> >> In the section 5.3, "PCE Discovery", you said "Mechanisms
> >> that rely on advertising or querying PCE locations across
> >> domains or provider boundaries are undesirable.".
> >>
> >> I want to know why it is an "undesirable" way.
> >>
> >
> > For the record, we has in the WG, long discussion on whether
> > we should advertise PCE across domains using for example BGP
> > for that matter.
> > There was a good consensus not to, considering the limited
> > number of interconnected domains. The advantage was limited
> > and introduces other issues (security) ...
> 
> Right. I recall that discussion.
> 
> And the situation with hierarchical PCE is worse.
> 
> Consider, a child PCE in domain-A does not know where the Parent PCE is. 
It 
> could be in *any* domain. In order to make contact with the parent PCE, 
the 
> child must either know where the parent is (configuration as recommended 
in 
> the I-D), or advertise itself across *all* domains. That is, for 
> child-advertisement to work, every PCE in the network must broadcast an 
> advertisement to every other node in every other domain in the whole 
> network. This is "undesirable".
> 
> Alternatively, consider a parent PCE that wants to contact the PCEs in 
each 
> of domain-A, B, ..., Z. It could be configured (as recommended in this 
I-D) 
> or it must send a broadcast query message to every node in each domain. 
> Since there is no domain address aggregation(CIDR being just a dream) 
the 
> parent PCE must broadcast to every node in the entire network. This is 
> "undesirable".
> 
> That is, both approaches to discovery are simply not scalable, and would 

> probably be filtered out at domain boundaries anyway.
> 
> With hierarchical PCE, we are looking at a peering relationship that is 
> certainly administrative and probably commercial. Such relationships 
involve 
> a lot of configuration and negotiation. Adding the configuration of 
> parent/child PCE locations is an almost trivial addition.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to