Hi,
just one clarification in the case of multiple associated end-to-end diverse
path computations.
Example: consider one additional end-to-end diverse path computation (say
Requests #3 and #4, source S2 and dest. D2) associated to the diverse
path computation S1-D1 reported in section 6.
The EROs computed for Req #1 and #2 (those in section 6.2) may be related to
the EROs computed for Req #3 and #4.
Thus, up to 9 EROs per request could be necessary in each path list.
However, if the two sets of computed EROs are independent, up to 3 EROs per
request would be sufficient (as in 6.2).
Is it required to enclose in the PCRep message all the combinations (even if
they are independent)?
Few typos:
- section 4.1, "may in the SVEC may"
- 6.2, last line, VSPT2 -> VSPT3
- 6.3, VSTP -> VSPT
Br,
Filippo
----- Original Message -----
From: "JP Vasseur" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 8:30 PM
Subject: [Pce] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-list-02.txt
Dear all,
This starts a 2-week WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-svec-
list-02.txt, which has been stable for quite some time, and is ready for
WG Last call. Please send your comments by September 16, 9:00am ET on the
mailing list.
We would also welcome feed-back from potential implementers.
Thanks.
JP and Julien.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
