Hi Julien, Yes, we still believe that we have a lot of work ahead them regarding this work item. We hope that adoption of this work item by the WG would make the work more visible and generate further interest in developing the overall solution.
I believe we have a broad consensus across the co-authors for how to move this work forward. Please give me a few days to confirm our plan with my co-authors and then I will mail you and the WG our intended strategy. Regards, Quintin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:57 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Request WG Adoption of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures Hi Quintin. It is a significant step that authors of both drafts agreed on working on a single document and we congratulate all of you for that. During IETF 76, you also mentioned "Lots of work and analysis ahead" and a need to "continue to review requirements and select the technique that best meets the requirements". Indeed, the current version of the document looks more like a solution list than an actual merge of former proposals. Considering the complexity induced by an inter-domain P2MP extension, we would appreciate before taking any decision that you elaborate on the way you intend to move forward towards a common solution. Thanks Julien ________________________________ From: Quintin Zhao [mailto:[email protected]] Hi Co-Chairs and PCE WG, Different parties have been working on solutions for computing P2MP paths across multi-domain networks. At IETF 75 we were requested by JP, to formulate a plan and resolve any issues in order to move the work forward. After calls and emails between draft-ali-pce-brpc-p2mp-ext and draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedure authors, we felt there was concurrence to merge the solutions and work together on a unified solution. At IETF 76 we presented our initial/combined PCE-based Shortest Constrained P2MP Inter-domain TE-LSP solution (draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-02). We would like to know if the co-chairs and WG would be in favor of the document becoming a WG draft? Regards, Quintin ********************************* This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. Messages are susceptible to alteration. France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender. ******************************** _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
