Hi JP,
There are discussions on the mailing list for the following two drafts, and
the drafts are updated according to some of the results of the discussions.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-ingress/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-egress/
Could you please allocate a slot for these drafts in IETF 81 in Quebec
since these follows the rules?
For the drafts
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation/
and
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path/
There are lots of discussions about them after the last IETF presentation in
Prague. The drafts are updated according to some of the comments and
suggestions from the discussions. You and many others should have seen these
discussions during and after the meeting.
I would like to request a time slot again to present and share the results
with the WG in IETF 81 Quebec.
The meeting of face to face with presentation in IETF should trigger
discussions on the topic to be presented. The results of the discussions should
be shared with WG in IETF again. So please consider my request for a slot to
share the results of discussions with WG.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
-----Original Message-----
From: JP Vasseur [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:20 AM
To: Huaimo Chen
Cc: Julien Meuric; Daniel King; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Ask for time slots in IETF 81
Dear Huaimo,
On Jul 11, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Huaimo Chen wrote:
> Hi Julien, JP and Dan,
>
> Could you please allocate three time slots for me as follows if possible?
>
> 15 minutes for
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation/
>
> 15 minutes for
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path/
>
> 10 minutes for
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-ingress/
> and
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-egress/
>
Thanks for your email. As explained in the other two emails, these drafts do
fall into the same
category of documents that were presented, without any further technical
discussion on the
mailing list. Please start technical thread on the mailing list.
Thanks.
JP and Julien.
>
> Best Regards,
> Huaimo
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
