Dear Huaimo, Believe me, Julien and I spent a lot of time looking at each draft. Bear in mind, that decisions at the IETF are made on mailing lists, the aim of meetings is to discuss issues, that's all. Please use the mailing list and let's see if there is some traction.
Thanks for your comprehension. Kind Regards. JP and Julien. On Jul 19, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Huaimo Chen wrote: > Hi JP, > > There are discussions about my IETF drafts on the PCE mailing list (I have > just looked through the list).In addition, all my four IETF drafts are > updated So please consider my requests for time slots in IETF 81 in Quebec > again. > They follow the rules. The time slots should be allocated for them. > > Best Regards, > Huaimo > -----Original Message----- > From: Huaimo Chen > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:17 AM > To: 'JP Vasseur' > Cc: Julien Meuric; Daniel King; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Ask for time slots in IETF 81 > > Hi JP, > > There are discussions on the mailing list for the following two drafts, > and the drafts are updated according to some of the results of the > discussions. > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-ingress/ > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-egress/ > Could you please allocate a slot for these drafts in IETF 81 in Quebec > since these follows the rules? > > For the drafts > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation/ > and > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path/ > There are lots of discussions about them after the last IETF presentation in > Prague. The drafts are updated according to some of the comments and > suggestions from the discussions. You and many others should have seen these > discussions during and after the meeting. > I would like to request a time slot again to present and share the results > with the WG in IETF 81 Quebec. > The meeting of face to face with presentation in IETF should trigger > discussions on the topic to be presented. The results of the discussions > should be shared with WG in IETF again. So please consider my request for a > slot to share the results of discussions with WG. > > Best Regards, > Huaimo > > -----Original Message----- > From: JP Vasseur [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:20 AM > To: Huaimo Chen > Cc: Julien Meuric; Daniel King; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Ask for time slots in IETF 81 > > Dear Huaimo, > > On Jul 11, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Huaimo Chen wrote: > >> Hi Julien, JP and Dan, >> >> Could you please allocate three time slots for me as follows if possible? >> >> 15 minutes for >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation/ >> >> 15 minutes for >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path/ >> >> 10 minutes for >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-ingress/ >> and >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-egress/ >> > > Thanks for your email. As explained in the other two emails, these drafts do > fall into the same > category of documents that were presented, without any further technical > discussion on the > mailing list. Please start technical thread on the mailing list. > > Thanks. > > JP and Julien. > >> >> Best Regards, >> Huaimo > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
