Begin forwarded message:
> From: JP Vasseur <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSPF] IETF 81 WG Minutes > Date: July 31, 2011 12:13:02 PM EDT > To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, "Abhay Roy (akr)" <[email protected]> > Cc: OSPF List <[email protected]> > > Thanks Acee, > > Just a feed-back on one ID after the PCE WG meeting: > > > 8) Updates to OSPF TE Extension for Area IDs Slides > draft-lu-ospf-area-tlv-01.txt > - Wenhu Lu > 10 minutes > > See slides > > Abhay: What were comments in PCE presentation? > Wenhu: Good reception. Why do we need to know Area ID? Isn't it enough to > simply know if ABR is TE enabled? Solution avoids "brute force" solution and > produces faster convergence. > > Abhay: Discussed with PCE chairs. RFC 5088 - extensions for PCE. Look at > those > extensions to see if they can be used. > Wenhu: Will do that. > > JP> The draft was discussed in the PCE WG meeting, but there was no consensus > that > this document provides an extension that addresses a use case for PCE. To be > discussed > on the PCE mailing list and we will keep you posted. > > Thanks. > > JP. > > On Jul 29, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > >> I've posted the IETF WG Minutes. Thanks much to Les Ginsberg for taking >> them. There was one ISP representative from Asia who commented but we did >> not get his name. If this was you, please unicast me and I will update the >> minutes with your name. >> >> Abhay and I will follow up with E-mails on specific documents presented at >> IETF 81. >> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/ospf.txt >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> _______________________________________________ >> OSPF mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
