Hi Ramon, Vishwas I think the WG prefer to use RFC errata, Please check the presentation material "WG status" in IETF81
Ramon Casellas <[email protected]> 发件人: [email protected] 2011-08-03 08:01 收件人 Vishwas Manral <[email protected]> 抄送 [email protected] 主题 Re: [Pce] PCE port number El 03/08/2011 1:51, Vishwas Manral escribió: > It very clearly is the case of a new draft required, we can expedite > this through the IETF processes so that it is made an RFC soon. I guess I am not knowledgeable enough about best/current IETF-related practices & procedures, so I will humbly step back and let others decide :) (chairs?) > Let me know if you are willing to help writing the draft. I think it > is a necessary requirement that will help the PCE community, which I > only see growing. If this is the case, gladly, although I guess it would be a one-page "Updates" RFC? R. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
<<image/gif>>
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
