Hi all.
The consensus is loud and clear: the I-D is adopted as WG document. Some
side comments have came up: as their scope is beyond the I-D itself,
please use the parallel threads to express your views.
Author, you may publish the I-D as draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-00.
Cheers,
Julien
Le 20/09/2011 17:08, Julien Meuric a écrit :
Hi PCE WG.
The framework for hierarchical PCE has been there for long, discussed
several times and was pending the charter update. This is a poll for
adopting draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06 as WG document. Please reply
to this message to express either your support, i.e. you consider the
I-D is a good foundation to address the issue, or your objection,
which you are expected to clarify.
Thank you,
JP & Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
