Hello, We submitted a new version of the Stateful PCE draft, where we addressed comments / suggestions from reviewers on the mailing list - many thanks to all who reviewed & commented.
We to hope to have a good discussion of the draft in Taipei. Thanks, Ed+Jan+Robert On 10/30/11 11:50 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: >A new version of I-D, draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-01.txt has been >successfully submitted by Jan Medved and posted to the IETF repository. > >Filename: draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce >Revision: 01 >Title: PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE >Creation date: 2011-10-30 >WG ID: Individual Submission >Number of pages: 41 > >Abstract: > The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides > mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path > computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests. > > Although PCEP explicitly makes no assumptions regarding the > information available to the PCE, it also makes no provisions for > synchronization or PCE control of timing and sequence of path > computations within and across PCEP sessions. This document > describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable this functionality, > providing stateful control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) > Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSP) via PCEP. > > > > > > >The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
