Hi Ramon, All, We can widen the draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability scope to include "gaps", one of which may include domain sequence representation. As usual though, we need to be able to demonstrate that new protocol developments are clearly required. The work (draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence) is interesting, but the document is not a WG draft and if I remember correctly has multiple open issues/options that need to be distilled.
So my first few questions would be: 1. Does the working group need to standardise domain sequence representation? If so, then I agree draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability is a viable candidate to document the requirements. 2. Is draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence a suitable solution? 3. Should we adopt as a WG document? If we can answer "yes" to all questions, then I would have no problem referencing the document in draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability. Br, Dan. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ramon Casellas Sent: 01 February 2012 15:53 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pce] New Version of draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability (02) Dear all, Dan El 16/01/2012 21:18, Daniel King escribió: > 3. Are we missing any PCE technology, mechanisms, protocol extensions? > So far I think we have touched on the following technologies in the document: (snip) Let me just mention Dhruv's draft on domain sequence encoding. It touches a quite concrete aspect on domain sequences but I believe it is relevant Caveat emptor: Yours truly is a co-author. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
